September 10, 2010, 06:04:32 pm
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News
:
Click here to get back to the Database!
Home
Help
Login
Register
leetupload
>
Programming
>
C
>
Changing aircrack to brute force attack
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Changing aircrack to brute force attack (Read 1219 times)
Tivav
Nubz04
Posts: 10
Changing aircrack to brute force attack
«
on:
April 13, 2009, 03:38:10 pm »
Hello everyone.
First of all, sorry for my english if it's bad. It has been some time since I have last wrote anything.
I have been doing some tests with Aircrack and my wireless network. I looked for a way to create my dictionary while testing the keys, in such a way that I don't have to create the dictionary in my computer, but just use the program to create the combinations while testing them.
I downloaded the source code and looked at it very quickly but finding the specific functions to open the dictionary and then replace by my code generator is a bit over my knowledge.
Does anyone ever tried this to tell me if it could work?
Thanks!
Logged
nullCypher
Nubz04
Posts: 18
Re: Changing aircrack to brute force attack
«
Reply #1 on:
September 04, 2009, 04:17:02 pm »
aircrack-ng already bruteforces keys (i think that is what you're getting at). Increase the fudge-factor to increase keyspace.... The fewer packets your get the more you should increase the fudge factor.
Logged
0cool$ su -l nullCypher
nullCypher# mv 0cool /dev/null
Tivav
Nubz04
Posts: 10
Re: Changing aircrack to brute force attack
«
Reply #2 on:
November 25, 2009, 04:37:40 pm »
Yes, aircrack does a brute force attack but it's necessary to have the dictionary file in the system. What I wanted was to change the code so that instead of getting the words for testing from a file, it already generated the key, tested it and if didn't work, erase it, just like as if it was creating the dictionary on the go but leaving nothing on the HD. This way there wouldn't be a need to have a dictionary on the computer and the program could test ALL of the combinations even if it took a REALLY LONG TIME...
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General Category
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
-----------------------------
Security
-----------------------------
=> Noob Questions
=> Penetration
=> Wireless
-----------------------------
Programming
-----------------------------
=> Java, J# and C#
=> C
=> C++ and C++.net
=> VB and VB.net
=> PHP
-----------------------------
Tutorials/Exploits
-----------------------------
=> Exploits
=> Tutorials
-----------------------------
Useful Tools
-----------------------------
=> Windows
=> *Nix
=> Miscellaneous
-----------------------------
Hardware Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Hardware
-----------------------------
Operating Systems
-----------------------------
=> Linux/UNIX/*BSD
=> Windows NT/2000 Server/2003
=> Windows XP
=> Windows Vista
-----------------------------
Off-Topic
-----------------------------
=> Off-Topic
Loading...